Repeat, not one answer
Independent observations make output variability visible.
METHODOLOGY · V1.0
We do not judge AI visibility from one screenshot or an unexplained score. Every finding connects to a query, repeat observation, raw evidence, rule, and limitation.
Last updated: 31 August 2026
Independent observations make output variability visible.
Mentions, recommendations, positions, and citations stay separate.
The records and classifications behind a result are retained.
Market, language, treatments, patient intent, and commercial scope are fixed before the benchmark begins.
Each query is observed multiple times; one answer is never treated as definitive evidence.
Language, market, date, provider, successful observations, and limitations are disclosed.
The outputs behind the review are retained within applicable licensing and privacy terms.
Clinic names, domains, and verified variations follow explicit matching rules.
Unknown clinics, unclear ranking language, and source relationships enter human review.
Text order is not treated as position without clear numbering or recommendation language.
Market, language, queries, and rules stay as consistent as possible when measuring change.
METRIC FORMULAS
Rates are presented with successful-observation counts and an explanation of how failed outputs were handled.
WHAT THE METHOD CANNOT PROVE
A benchmark does not prove revenue, patient demand, clinical quality, treatment outcomes, or a permanent AI ranking. It separates observation from inference.
A TRANSPARENT START